LegislativeSessionUpdate-FB

What we’re watching: February state legislative update

Share

Health Forward is supporting and building inclusive, powerful, and healthy communities by prioritizing people who experience the greatest injustices in health outcomes. We are working to remove those injustices through our leadership, advocacy, and resources.

The 2025 sessions continue to have strong momentum and, like many who we’ve talked to over the past few weeks, we are working double-time to stay up on developments. In addition to the speed, the volume of legislation is significant, with over 3,100 pieces of legislation being filed in Kansas and Missouri combined. We are grateful for your extra eyes and ears as we all work together to achieve policy wins to help our neighbors. 

Take a look at our policy agendas for Kansas and Missouri, to get a sense of how the action in Kansas and Missouri impacts the outcomes we seek to advance through Health Forward’s purpose plan.

Kansas

Topline takeaways:

  • SB 4, which eliminate the three-day grace period for returning advance mail-in ballots, passed both the Senate and House chambers, and it’s looking like the bill will make it to the Governor’s desk where it would face a veto. Whether the veto holds or not likely depends on a single vote in the House.  
  • Bills that encroach on the ability of the executive branch to make policy through waivers to the federal government both passed in the House and Senate – HB 2240 and SB 161, respectively. Not only do these bills weaken policy innovation from the Governor’s office, but they would also make it so new programs in Kansas – like Community Health Workers over the past couple of years – will have little chance of getting started. We oppose these bills. 
  • Legislation that would eliminate the statewide affordable housing tax credit in Kansas – HB 2119 – has passed the House and was heard in the Senate. We oppose the wholesale elimination of the tax credit as it promoted the development of thousands of homes in the state.  
  • Once again, the push to eliminate the three-day grace period for returning advance mail-in ballots is on the menu for some legislators. SB 4 and HB 2017 both would require that these ballots be returned by 7 p.m. on election day, which would potentially disenfranchise thousands of voters, especially rural Kansans. We testified in opposition to SB 4 earlier in the month, but the hearing on HB 2017 was cancelled, which means SB 4 is the main bill for this.
  • The post-COVID push to limit the authority of public health officials at the local and state levels continues into its third year with SBs 19 and 29. Our primary concern in these bills is that they limit the authority of local and state health officials to implement reasonable regulations, like isolation or personal protective equipment, to prevent the spread of infectious disease outbreaks. We testified in opposition to both of these bills.
  • Legislation on housing is also starting to make headway in committees. HB 2119, which we oppose, would eliminate the statewide affordable housing tax credit in Kansas, which has spurred the development of thousands of homes in the state. Thank you to UCS of Johnson for their efforts to coordinate advocacy on this bill. On a brighter note, we recently supported HB 2074 when it was heard in committee, as it would restore the homestead property tax refund to renters.

People policy goal: People can easily access safe, quality, and affordable whole—person care.

Policy issue and relevant legislation What it does Status Our stance
Removing authority of public health officials (SB 19 and SB 29)  These bills generally remove the authority of statewide public health officials to do their job: prevent the spread of infectious diseases.  SB 19 was heard on Feb. 5 and SB 29 was heard Feb. 7 in the Senate Public Health and Welfare Committee. It was heard on the House side, March 7. We oppose both of these bills. They would actively harm public health, especially in infectious disease outbreaks. 
Legislation being monitored: Extending access of nutrition assistance to those with felonies (HB 2178) | Reproductive rights regulation (SB 67, HB 2171, HB 2009, HB 2010) 

Power policy goal: Participation in our democracy and policymaking process improves health outcomes.

 

Policy issue and relevant legislation What they do Status Our stance
Restricting advance mail in ballot voting (HB 2017, SB 4)  These bills would require that advance mail in ballots be returned by 7 pm on election day.  SB 4 has passed both chambers and is in a Conference Committee. The hearing on Feb. 6 for HB 2017 was cancelled indicating that SB 4 is the main vehicle.  We oppose these bills as they all make it more difficult to vote in advance, vote by mail in ballot, or to access them in the first place. 
Banning localities from using ranked choice voting (SB 6)  As described in the policy issue.  It passed out of the Senate on Feb. 5 and was heard on the House side, Feb. 27.  We wrote opposition testimony for the House Elections Committee hearing. 
Prohibiting localities from taking federal dollars for elections (SB 5)  As described in the policy issue.  Passed the Senate on Feb. 11 and heard on the House side Feb. 25..  We opposed this legislation on the House side. 
Modifies requirements to submit an application for an advance voting ballot (SB 231)  Would tweak the application process, especially for changing the requirement to provide your own envelope and postage, for advance mail in ballots.  Was heard on March 3, and passed out of committee on March 4.  We provided testimony in opposition to this bill. 
Legislation being monitored: Amend the constitution to provide legislative oversight of executive rules and regulations (HCR 5008) | Creating the crime of interfering with an election official (HB 2023) | Regulating ballot drop boxes (HB 2021) 

Place policy goal: Our communities are healthy place where people fully participate in the digital economy and build wealth through safe, quality, and affordable housing and homeownership.

Policy issue and relevant legislation What it does Status Our stance
Extending the Homestead Property Tax refund to renters (HB 2074).  Allows renters to qualify for up to $700 in a refundable tax credit, which can be put towards the cost of renting.  Heard in the House Committee on Taxation on Feb. 6.  We supported this legislation and provided written testimony in committee. 
Sealing and expungement of court records in eviction actions (HB 2357)  Ensures that eviction records are sealed and that eviction cases go to mediation to help prevent an eviction from going on a renter’s permanent record.  Heard in the House on Feb. 10.  We provided testimony in support of this legislation. 
Elimination of the state affordable housing tax credit (HB 2119)  As described in the policy issue.  Passed the House on Feb. 20, 85-36 and was heard in the Senate on March 6.  We oppose this legislation and provided testimony in both hearings. 
Fair chance in homelessness and housing act (SB 100)  Limits how previous evictions and rental arrears can be used to prevent people from getting housing.  Introduced on Jan. 30.  We would be supportive of this legislation should it receive a public hearing. 
Legislation being monitored: A property tax exemption for the first $100,000 of assessed value (SB 90) | Inspections of private properties receiving government assistance (HB 2099) | The Fast Track Permits act (HB 2088) | Restricting property tax increases to those age 65 and older (HB 2080) 

Platform policy goal: Community health is influenced by systems, policies, and stories that promote racial equity and economic inclusion.

 

Policy issue and relevant legislation What it does Status Our stance
Voiding racially exclusive covenants on certain residential properties (SB 194)  Removes and invalidates racially restrictive covenants on property owned by the state.  Heard on Feb. 27 in the Senate.  We submitted testimony in support of this legislation. 
Prohibiting undocumented individuals from receiving any state public benefits (SB 254)  Would target any undocumented individual in Kansas from receiving any state or local public dollars or benefit.  Heard on Feb. 27 in the Senate.  Because it would prevent undocumented individuals who were brought to the United States as children from receiving in-state tuition, we testified in opposition to this bill. 
Legislation being monitored: Requiring employers to use e-verify (HB 2066) | Resolution to cooperate with federal enforcement of immigration laws – SCR 1602 

A comprehensive view of what we’re tracking can be found at our full Kansas Bill Tracker. 

Missouri

Topline takeaways:

  • Both the House of Representatives and the Governor have made moves with the anti-diversity, equity, and inclusion policy changes. Governor Kehoe issued EO 25-18, which bans virtually any program, policy, or position focusing on any aspect of diversity, equity, and inclusion from getting state funding. HB 742 passed the House quickly and was heard in the Senate on March 3. It also bans all state money spent on diversity, equity, and inclusion which jeopardizes billions of dollars in economic activity and thousands of jobs, not to mention health equity and pathway programs for underrepresented populations to work in the medical field.  
  • Despite having passed with a majority of voters, guaranteed paid sick leave and a pay raise for 1.1 million Missourians is under threat. HB 567 would prevent the full implementation of Proposition A. We stand with working Missourians who need time away from work when they or a family member are ill and needs care. We oppose this legislation. 
  • Because of the success of voter-driven initiatives, the General Assembly continues to find ways to undermine the initiative petition process. SB 22 passed the Senate and, even though it was made slightly more palatable through amendment, Health Forward still opposes it. SJR 47 increases the threshold for passage of initiatives and HBs 551 and 575 add onerous requirements for people gathering signatures. This legislation demonstrates that efforts to weaken the citizen-led process are comprehensive. 
  • We also want to point to the bills moving through the Assembly that we support and think would help people in meaningful ways. SB 94 expands telehealth coverage to include audio-only options. HB 398 is a comprehensive women’s and infant health bill. Or modernizing the property tax circuit breaker with SB 101 and creating a rural workforce housing fund with HB 245 – there are good pieces of legislation that we will continue to support and work with legislators to advance through to law. 

 

People policy goal: People can easily access safe, quality, and affordable whole—person care.

Policy issue and relevant legislation What it does Status Our stance
Reproductive right restrictions (HJRs 9, 14, 54 and SJRs 5 and 9, amongst others)  These bills are direct responses to the overturn of the abortion ban with Amendment 3. HJR 54 and SJRs 5 and 9 link gender affirming care bans to reproductive rights, banning both. HJR 54 was heard on Feb. 4. SJR 33 passed out of committee on March 5.  We oppose additional attempts to immediately overturn the will of the people and banning gender affirming care to and reproductive rights.
Women’s and maternal health legislation (HB 255, 398, SB 39, and HB 483, amongst other legislation that promotes maternal health)  HB 398 updates birth control coverage and pre-natal screenings that improve maternal and infant health. HB 255 is a broad bill requiring training on culturally relevant care and data collection disaggregated by several factors, while SB 39 focuses on data disaggregation of maternal health for the Pregnancy Associated Maternal Review board. HB 483 is a sales tax exemption for diapers, prenatal vitamins and other items. We provided written testimony in support of HB 398, which passed out of committee unanimously on March 5.  We are generally supportive of these kinds of bills, which help to advance maternal health and reduce disparities based on race, place, and income level. 
Medicaid and health access or coverage (HBs 186, 822, 825, and SB 94, SJR 43, amongst others).  HBs 822 & 825, as well as HB 186 caps the price of insulin and keeps it at an inflation adjusted-rate only. HBs 282 and  adds ‘audio-only’ options to telehealth, and SJR 43 would add work requirements to expanded Medicaid. SB 94 passed the Senate and has been read into the House at the end of February. SJR 43 passed out of its committee on March 5.  We support reasonable measures to keep costs of care and medication affordable, as well as expanding telehealth. We provided testimony in support of HB 822 and 825 and support SB 94. And we will always oppose work requirements to expanded Medicaid or any other safety net program.
Mental health – HB 676  Creates a mental health leave program for workers.  Has been introduced in committee.  We would support this legislation but are unclear about it advancing. 
Restaurant meals program – SB 130  Allows seniors and those with disabilities to use their Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits to buy hot meals.  Has been introduced in committee.  We have supported this legislation in the past and will continue to do so until it is adopted and implemented. 

 

Power policy goal: Participation in our democracy and policymaking process improves health outcomes.

Policy issue and relevant legislation What it does Status Our stance
Modifying items related to the citizen ballot initiative – (SB 22, HBs 551 and 575, and HJRs 10, 11, 16, SJR 47, amongst many others)  SB 22 makes it so that courts can’t modify ballot summaries on joint resolutions coming from the Assembly, while HBs 551 and 575 add residency requirements for signature gatherers for initiatives. HJR 10, 11, 16, and SJR 47 all increase the threshold for passage of ballot initiatives. SB 22 passed the Senate and has been read into the House. , while HBs 551 and 575 have also passed out of their committees. SJR 47 had a public hearing on March 3.  We oppose all of these bills and resolutions and testified in opposition to HB 551 and 575. 
Voting modifications – (HB 333, HB 367, SB 470, and SJR 44, amongst others)  HB 333 creates an unreasonable signature verification for absentee ballots; HB 367 and SB 470 extends no excuse absentee voting to 6 weeks ahead of the election, and SJR 44 creates a photo id requirement for registration to vote.  HB 367 has moved the most of these and passed out of committee on Feb. 26th.  We provided testimony in support of HB 367. We oppose HB 333 and SJR 44 strongly. They would end up disenfranchising legitimate votes or discouraging people from voting at all.

Place policy goal: Our communities are healthy place where people fully participate in the digital economy and build wealth through safe, quality, and affordable housing and homeownership.

Policy issue and relevant legislation What It Does Status Our stance
Preempting local governments on requiring landlords to take housing assistance (HBs 595 and 343)  Prohibits local governments from requiring landlords from taking federal housing assistance. HB 595 moved out of the House 104-38 on Feb. 13, and has been heard in the Senate on March 3.  We are strongly opposed and testified in opposition to this legislation as it would make it more difficult to secure safe, affordable, and quality housing for people earning a low wage. 
Housing Attainability and AffordabilitySB 101  and HB 245.  SB 101 modernizes the “property tax circuit breaker”. HB 245 creates a rural workforce housing fund.  SB 101 is ready to be heard on the Senate floor at any time and HB 245 had a public hearing on March 5.  We testified in support of both of these bills. 
Eviction provision modifications (SB 168)  This bill moves eviction proceeding hearings to one day rather than two and creates a felony for ‘unlawful occupation of property’.  It was heard on Feb. 18.  We oppose this bill strongly and will do so when it is heard. 
Broadband sales tax exemptionSB 185  See issue description.  It passed out of committee on Feb. 25.  We will submit written support if this bill is heard. 

 

Platform policy goal: Community health is influenced by systems, policies, and stories that promote racial equity and economic inclusion.

Policy issue and relevant legislation What it does Status Our stance
Anti-diversity, equity and inclusion legislation – HB 742 and SB 272  HB 742 is a copycat of previous bills in that it bans any state spending on diversity, equity, and inclusion. SB 272 makes it a crime to do business while taking diversity, equity, and inclusion into consideration.  HB 742 has passed the House and was heard on the Senate side on March 3. SB 272 has only been read in.  We staunchly oppose all anti-DEI legislation as it cuts directly against our purpose of strengthening and building inclusive, powerful, and healthy communities characterized by racial equity and economic justice. We testified in opposition to HB 742 in the House and Senate side. 
Immigration – SB 72 and HB 540  SB 72 allows for people to become bounty hunters on people they perceive to be ‘illegal and HB 540 creates a crime to be undocumented in Missouri.  SB 72 was heard in committee and HB 540 has been referred to committee.  We oppose both of these bills as they would result in racial profiling and physical harm to people.

These bills highlighted are ones we are keeping a focus on, but here is a full list of the bills we’re tracking in Missouri.