Legislative-Blog-Header-02162

What we’re watching: January 2023 legislative update in Kansas, Missouri

Share

Welcome to the first installment of our monthly legislative updates, where we work to inform you on key legislation as it progresses, stalls, or dies out. Furthermore, we work to directly tie our updates to our new policy agendas for 2023 and 2024 in Kansas and Missouri, as well as how they advance — or undermine — the strategy laid out in our purpose plan released last year.

Even though the legislative sessions in Kansas and Missouri are just getting underway, an incredible amount of activity has been taking place in Topeka and Jefferson City. With that in mind, let’s get started with discussing what’s been happening in Kansas.

What’s top of mind in Kansas:

  • Medicaid expansion is very unlikely to be adopted in Kansas, despite the immense benefits to all Kansans. It’s our view that introduced legislation is unlikely to get a hearing as opponents of expanding KanCare control leadership in both houses of the Kansas Legislature.
  • Gov. Laura Kelly has pushed to immediately eliminate the food sales tax this year after legislation was adopted in 2022 to phase it out by 2025. The governor’s new proposal would provide families immediate relief from the food sales tax, as well as eliminate the sales tax on feminine hygiene products and diapers.
  • An onslaught of legislation that will add unnecessary voting barriers are being heard and considered in the Kansas House Elections Committee. These bills would only serve to make voting more difficult for every voting Kansan, but especially for Kansans of color.

People policy goal: People can easily access safe, quality, and affordable whole-person care.

Legislation What it does Status Our stance
SB 570% Food Sales Tax, Feminine Hygiene Products, and Diapers  Makes healthy foods more accessible and affordable to all Kansans. It has only been introduced to the Assessment and Taxation Committee We support the legislation as currently written.
SB 45 and HB 2050Updating eligibility requirements for the state children’s health insurance program (SCHIP). Updates eligibility requirements that are outdated and which would result in more children being eligible for coverage under SCHIP. Both have only been introduced in their respective committees in the Senate and House. HB 2050 will have an informational hearing Feb. 9. We support the legislation as currently written.

In addition to this legislation, Health Forward hosted a day at the statehouse in Topeka on Jan. 26. We organized a panel to discuss community health workers in Kansas and welcomed about a dozen partner organizations as well as 10 legislators. We are advocating that Kansas takes up a state plan amendment to ensure work done by community health workers receives stable funding through Medicaid.

Power policy goal: Participation in our democracy and policymaking process improves health outcomes.

Legislation What it does Status Our stance
HB 2053 — Provides authority for the Secretary of State (SoS) to adopt rules and regulations for the use of remote ballot boxes. Provides sweeping authority to the SoS to adopt ‘rules and regulations’ for ballot drop boxes. There are no limitations on what these rules and regulations could be. It passed out of the House Committee on Elections on Feb. 6. We oppose this legislation and submitted written testimony against it.
HB 2056Eliminates three-day grace period for advance mail-in ballots. Kansas currently has a three-day grace period for ballots to arrive to be counted following election day. This would remove that grace period, which would mean many people’s valid votes would not count. It passed out of the House Committee on Elections on Feb. 1. We oppose this legislation and provided written and oral testimony against it.
HB 2057 — Capping the number of remote ballot drop boxes at one per 30,000 registered voters. This legislation arbitrarily caps the number of ballot drop boxes. It would reduce the number of drop boxes available around the state and add unnecessary barriers to rural Kansans and people of color. Furthermore, it would impose unnecessary costs to counties without any funding to comply. It received a hearing in the House Committee on Elections on Jan. 31. We oppose this legislation and submitted written testimony against it.

Place policy goal: Our communities are healthy place where people fully participate in the digital economy and build wealth through safe, quality, and affordable housing and homeownership.

At this point, we aren’t tracking any relevant legislation that pertains to digital equity or wealth building through homeownership. During such time when legislation is introduced, we will consult with partners and consider what our stance on the bill may be most appropriate.

Platform Policy Goal: Community health is influenced by systems, policies, and stories that promote racial equity and economic inclusion.

Legislation What it does Status Our stance
HB 2044 and SB 36Adds hair texture and protective hair styles to the Kansas Act against Discrimination These bills would make it unlawful to discriminate against someone based on their hairstyle typically associated with race, including braids, locs, and twists. It would ensure that people with afro-textured hair are not discriminated against based on their choice of hair style. These bills have been introduced to their respective committees in the House and Senate. Health Forward supports these bills as currently written. It ensures that people wearing natural or protective hair styles do not face discrimination, which disproportionately impacts Black women in the workplace. It aligns with our stance that racial equity should be pursued in all policies.

While these bills are some of the ones we’re most focused on, there are more included in our Kansas Bill Tracker.

What’s top of mind in Missouri:

  • Once again, the General Assembly is taking up Senate Joint Resolution 4, that would subject Medicaid expansion to the annual appropriations process and add harmful work requirements to the program. This legislation is identical to HJR 117 from 2022. Health Forward is adamantly opposed.
  • The Missouri House sent HJR 43 to the Missouri Senate. It raises the threshold to pass a citizen initiative petition to 60 percent of votes, over the current simple majority. “Reforming” the citizen initiative petition process has been a key goal of some legislators for the past couple of sessions. Health Forward opposes these changes as they seek to remove the ability of voters to directly influence policy.
  • There is a bipartisan effort to extend Medicaid coverage for new mothers and their children from the current 60 days to a full year. This is key to helping reduce maternal mortality rates overall, as well as disparities in these deaths by race and ethnicity. Health Forward supports these efforts.

People policy goal: People can easily access safe, quality, and affordable whole-person care.

Legislation What it does Status Our stance
SJR 4 — Puts on the ballot an initiative to subject Medicaid expansion to the annual appropriations process and to add work requirements. This would put an initiative on a statewide ballot to put voter-approved Medicaid expansion to an annual appropriations process where it could be de-funded. It also adds work requirements. It received a hearing on Feb. 1. We are opposed to this legislation and provided opposition testimony. Furthermore, we stand against any work requirement provisions for access to safety net services as they are of racist origins.
SB 45modifies provisions to MOHealthNet services for pregnant and postpartum women. *Please note that there are numerous bills on this issue. This is one that has received movement recently. Extends postpartum Medicaid coverage to new mothers and their babies from 60 days to one full year. It passed out of committee on Feb. 1 and has been placed on the Senate calendar. We support the legislation as currently written.
SB 82modifies provisions for public assistance (TANF, SNAP, and low-income housing assistance) This bill addresses the “cliff effect” whereby benefits to programs like TANF, SNAP, and housing assistance are entirely cut off once a person’s income rises to a level that is not financially sustainable. This bill introduces ‘transitional benefits’ based on a sliding scale relative to income rather than a single cutoff threshold. It received a hearing on Feb. 1. We support this legislation and provided affirmative testimony.

Power policy goal: Participation in our democracy and policymaking process improves health outcomes.

Legislation What it does Status Our stance
HJR 43 — Modifies the threshold for passage of citizen initiative petitions. *Please note there are numerous bills on this issue. This one has moved the furthest recently. This bill would increase the threshold for passing a citizen initiative petition from the current simple majority (50% + 1 vote) to a supermajority 60%. It passed out of the House of Representatives on Feb. 2, 108 – 50. It has been moved over to the Senate. We oppose this legislation and delivered oral testimony against it during the committee hearing on Jan. 24.
HB 780 — Requiring initiative petition circulators to be registered MO voters. As the title indicates, it would restrict initiative petition signature gatherers to only registered Missouri voters. It received a hearing on Feb. 2. We oppose this legislation and delivered written testimony against it during the hearing on Feb. 2.

Place policy goal: Our communities are healthy place where people fully participate in the digital economy and build wealth through safe, quality, and affordable housing and homeownership.

Legislation What it does Status Our stance
Broadband — There are several bills further codifying broadband expansion in Missouri: HB 461 — Establishing Broadband Development Council to collect data, report on, and provide recommendations to the Legislature. SB 71 — Authorizing electrical corporations to provide broadband. See brief descriptions in the legislation column. HB 461 received a public hearing on Feb 1. SB 71 has just been introduced. We are observing these bills and may provide testimony at the appropriate time depending on if these or other bills advance or hinder digital equity.

Platform policy goal: Community health is influenced by systems, policies, and stories that promote racial equity and economic inclusion.

Legislation What it does Status Our stance
SB 410 and HB 489Establishes the “Do No Harm” act regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion in institutions receiving state health care dollars. This bill would prohibit institutions educating medical professionals and whom receive state funding from including any curriculum on diversity, equity, or inclusion (DEI) or risks losing that funding. Both of these bills have been introduced to committee, but no public hearings are scheduled yet. Health Forward is opposed to these bills as currently written.
SB 579Modifying the Pregnancy-Associated Mortality Review (PAMR) Board This legislation would put a refined emphasis on the PAMR board and includes provisions to ensure that data are disaggregated by race, ethnicity, language, and other dimensions. This bill was introduced on Feb. 1. Health Forward supports this bill as currently written. This bill would provide the data necessary to help make decisions to reduce racial disparities in maternal mortality.

While these bills are some of the ones we’re most focused on, there are more included in our Missouri Bill Tracker.