LegislativeSessionUpdate-FB

Starting off 2025: January State Legislative Update

Share

Health Forward is supporting and building inclusive, powerful, and healthy communities by prioritizing people who experience the greatest injustices in health outcomes. We are working to remove those injustices through our leadership, advocacy, and resources.

The 2025 sessions have really leapt out ahead of where we were at this point last year. Lots of legislation is moving on both sides of the state line and we’ve got our hands full tracking and weighing in on them, all while balancing our community events like our Annual Policy Forum on Jan. 9 and Missouri Advocacy Day on Feb. 4.

Take a look at our policy agendas for Kansas and Missouri, to get a sense of how the action in Kansas and Missouri impacts the outcomes we seek to advance through Health Forward’s purpose plan.

Kansas

  • Once again, the push to eliminate the three-day grace period for returning advance mail-in ballots is on the menu for some legislators. SB 4 and HB 2017 both would require that these ballots be returned by 7 p.m. on election day, which would potentially disenfranchise thousands of voters, especially rural Kansans. We testified in opposition to SB 4 earlier in the month, but the hearing on HB 2017 was cancelled, which means SB 4 is the main bill for this.
  • The post-COVID push to limit the authority of public health officials at the local and state levels continues into its third year with SBs 19 and 29. Our primary concern in these bills is that they limit the authority of local and state health officials to implement reasonable regulations, like isolation or personal protective equipment, to prevent the spread of infectious disease outbreaks. We testified in opposition to both of these bills.
  • Legislation on housing is also starting to make headway in committees. HB 2119, which we oppose, would eliminate the statewide affordable housing tax credit in Kansas, which has spurred the development of thousands of homes in the state. Thank you to UCS of Johnson for their efforts to coordinate advocacy on this bill. On a brighter note, we recently supported HB 2074 when it was heard in committee, as it would restore the homestead property tax refund to renters.

People policy goal: People can easily access safe, quality, and affordable whole—person care.

Policy issue and relevant legislation What it does Status Our stance
Removing authority of public health officials (SB 19 and SB 29)  These bills generally remove the authority of statewide public health officials to do their job: prevent the spread of infectious diseases.  SB 19 was heard on Feb. 5 and SB 29 was heard Feb. 7 in the Senate Public Health and Welfare Committee.  We oppose both of these bills. They would actively harm public health, especially in infectious disease outbreaks. 
Reproductive right regulation (SB 67, HB 2171, HB 2009, HB 2010)  These bills generally restrict reproductive rights, which is affirmed and preserved in the Kansas Constitution, rendering these bills unconstitutional from the start.  These bills have all been introduced in their respective committees.  We are monitoring these bills. 
Extending access of nutrition assistance to those with felonies (HB 2178)  Would allow those with felony convictions to access nutrition assistance benefits.  This bill was introduced on Jan. 30.  We are monitoring this legislation, though are more inclined to support it. 

 

Power policy goal: Participation in our democracy and policymaking process improves health outcomes.

Policy issue and relevant legislation What they do Status Our stance
Restricting advance mail in ballot voting (HB 2017, SB 4)  These bills would require that advance mail in ballots be returned by 7 pm on election day.  SB 4 was heard on January 23rd and was passed out shortly after. The hearing on Feb. 6 for HB 2017 was cancelled indicating that SB 4 is the main vehicle.  We oppose these bills as they all make it more difficult to vote in advance, vote by mail in ballot, or to access them in the first place. 
Regulating ballot drop boxes (HB 2021)  Would give the secretary of state the authority to adopt rules and regulations for the use of ballot drop boxes.  HB 2021 was heard on Jan. 30.  We are monitoring this legislation and watching if any provisions would be added to move us to opposition. 
Creating the crime of interfering with an election official (HB 2023)  As described in the policy issue.  It was heard on Feb. 6 in place of HB 2017.  We are monitoring this legislation and watching if any provisions would be added to move us to opposition. 
Banning localities from using ranked choice voting (SB 6)  As described in the policy issue.  It passed out of committee on Jan. 29, 2025.  We will oppose this legislation if it is heard on the House side. 
Amend the constitution to provide legislative oversight of executive rules and regulations (HCR 5008)  Allows the legislature to oversee and overturn certain executive rules and regulations.  Heard Monday Feb. 3. We monitored and are opposed to this legislation but were unable to submit testimony in time.

 

Place policy goal: Our communities are healthy place where people fully participate in the digital economy and build wealth through safe, quality, and affordable housing and homeownership.

Policy issue and relevant legislation What it does Status Our stance
Extending the Homestead Property Tax refund to renters (HB 2074).  Allows renters to qualify for up to $700 in a refundable tax credit, which can be put towards the cost of renting.  Heard in the House Committee on Taxation on Feb. 6.  We supported this legislation and provided written testimony in committee. 
Restricting property tax increases to those age 65 and older (HB 2080)  Designed to help keep property taxes low for seniors.  Introduced to the House Committee on Taxation.  We supported this legislation and provided written testimony in committee. 
The Fast Track Permits act (HB 2088)  Requires local governments to meet deadlines for real estate development to move projects along quicker.  Heard on Jan. 30.  We are monitoring this legislation. 
Inspections of private properties receiving government assistance (HB 2099)  Allows for periodic inspections of private residential properties that receive government assistance to ensure they are meeting a quality livings standard.  Heard on Jan. 29.  We are monitoring this legislation. 
Elimination of the state affordable housing tax credit (HB 2119)  As described in the policy issue.  Heard on Feb. 6.  We oppose this legislation and provided testimony indicating such. 
A property tax exemption for the first $100,000 of assessed value (SB 90)  Also allows local governments to run a ballot question to opt out of the provision.  Introduced on Jan. 29.  We are monitoring this legislation. 
Fair chance in homelessness and housing act (SB 100)  Limits how previous evictions and rental arrears can be used to prevent people from getting housing.  Introduced on Jan. 30.  We would be supportive of this legislation should it receive a public hearing. 

 

Platform policy goal: Community health is influenced by systems, policies, and stories that promote racial equity and economic inclusion.

Policy issue and relevant legislation What it does Status Our stance
Requiring employers to use e-verify (HB 2066)  To prevent undocumented individuals from being put on a payroll.  Introduced to committee on Jan. 23.  We are monitoring this legislation. 
Resolution to cooperate with federal enforcement of immigration laws – SCR 1602  See issue description. Please note that this is non-binding.  This has passed out of the Senate on Jan. 29 and has a hearing scheduled for Feb. 13.  We are monitoring this legislation and would oppose if it changed law in any way. These highlighted bills are ones we are keeping a focus on, but to see a full list of the bills we’re tracking in Kansas.

A comprehensive view of what we’re tracking can be found at our full Kansas Bill Tracker, which includes bills from last year that are still viable.

Missouri

  • The House of Representatives is moving a high volume of legislation extremely fast. We’ve seen a new anti-DEI bill, HB 742, get heard quickly and move out of committee. It bans all state money spent on diversity, equity, and inclusion which jeopardizes billions of dollars in economic activity and thousands of jobs, not to mention health equity programs across the state. We testified in opposition.
  • We’re also watching and actively working against the slate of bills that either undermine the will of the people or make it more difficult for people to express their policy needs through the ballot initiative process. Proposition A – which voters passed to guarantee paid sick leave and raise wages for 1.1 million Missourians – would be undermined by proposed legislation. HBs 546, 567, 758, and 958 would prevent Proposition A from going into effect in a variety of ways. This is in addition to the attacks on reproductive rights that were enshrined by Amendment 3, too. Some of these include HJR 54 and SJR 23 which use misleading language to ban access to reproductive health and prohibit gender affirming care.
  • On top of all that, there are well over a dozen bills to undermine the initiative petition process or resolutions that go to a vote of the people. SB 22 would make it so courts couldn’t modify summary statements on resolutions coming from the General Assembly, and HBs 551 and
  • Finally, we testified against the bills that preempt localities from requiring landlords to accept housing assistance for people with limited optons for affordable place to live – those are HBs 343 and 595. In a time where rents are increasing at unprecedented rates, this takes away a tool for local communities to help people secure a roof over their head and the opportunities for improved health outcomes that result

 

People policy goal: People can easily access safe, quality, and affordable whole—person care.

Policy issue and relevant legislation What it does Status Our stance
Reproductive right restrictions (HJRs 9, 14, 54 and SJRs 5 and 9, amongst others)  These bills are direct responses to the overturn of the abortion ban with Amendment 3. HJR 54 and SJRs 5 and 9 link gender affirming care bans to reproductive rights, banning both. HJR 54 was heard on Feb. 4.  We oppose additional attempts to immediately overturn the will of the people and banning gender affirming care to and reproductive rights.
Maternal health legislation (HB 255, SB 39, and HB 483, amongst other legislation that promotes maternal health)  HB 255 is a broad bill requiring training on culturally relevant care and data collection disaggregated by several factors, while SB 39 focuses on data disaggregation of maternal health for the Pregnancy Associated Maternal Review board. HB 483 is a sales tax exemption for diapers, prenatal vitamins and other items.  These bills have been introduced in their respective committees and we will update them or others as we begin to see movement.  We are generally supportive of these kinds of bills, which help to advance maternal health and reduce disparities based on race, place, and income level. 
Medicaid and health access or coverage (HBs 186, 567, and SJR 43, amongst others).  HB 186 caps the price of insulin and keeps it at an inflation adjusted-rate only. HB 567 adds ‘audio-only’ options to telehealth, and SJR 43 would add work requirements to expanded Medicaid.  HB 186 and SJR 43 have been introduced to their committees, while HB 567 was heard Feb. 4.  We support reasonable measures to keep costs of care and medication affordable, as well as expanding telehealth. We provided testimony in support of HB 567. And we will always oppose work requirements to expanded Medicaid or any other safety net program. 
Mental health – HB 676  Creates a mental health leave program for workers.  Has been introduced in committee.  We would support this legislation but are unclear about it advancing. 
Restaurant meals program – SB 130  Allows seniors and those with disabilities to use their Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits to buy hot meals.  Has been introduced in committee.  We have supported this legislation in the past and will continue to do so until it is adopted and implemented. 

 

Power policy goal: Participation in our democracy and policymaking process improves health outcomes.

Policy issue and relevant legislation What it does Status Our stance
Modifying items related to the citizen ballot initiative – (SB 22, HBs 551 and 575, and HJRs 10, 11, 16, SJR 47, amongst many others)  SB 22 makes it so that courts can’t modify ballot summaries on joint resolutions coming from the Assembly, while HBs 551 and 575 add residency requirements for signature gatherers for initiatives. HJR 10, 11, 16, and 47 all increase the threshold for passage of ballot initiatives.   SB 22 has been heard and has passed out of committee, while HBs 551 and 575 have also been heard in committee. Many other bills remain just introduced to their committees.  We oppose all of these bills and resolutions and testified in opposition to HB 551 and 575. 
Voting modifications – (HB 333, SB 470, and SJR 44, amongst others)  HB 333 creates an unreasonable signature verification for absentee ballots; SB 470 extends no excuse absentee voting to 6 weeks ahead of the election, and SJR 44 creates a photo id requirement for registration to vote.  These bills have been read in and HB 333 has been referred to committee.  We oppose HB 333 and SJR 44 strongly. They would end up disenfranchising legitimate votes or discouraging people from voting at all. We would support SB 470 as it would help people have more flexibility when choosing to vote. 

 

Place policy goal: Our communities are healthy place where people fully participate in the digital economy and build wealth through safe, quality, and affordable housing and homeownership.

Policy issue and relevant legislation What It Does Status Our stance
Preempting local governments on requiring landlords to take housing assistance (HBs 595 and 343)  Prohibits local governments from requiring landlords from taking federal housing assistance. Both of these bills have been heard in committee with HB 595 likely the vehicle passing out soon. We are strongly opposed and testified in opposition to this legislation as it would make it more difficult to secure safe, affordable, and quality housing for people earning a low wage. 
Housing Attainability and Affordability – HB 45 and HB 240 in example as there are some others.  HB 45 improves the “property tax circuit breaker” by increasing the limits to qualify. HB 240 provides tax credits to workforce and disaster recovery housing.  Both bills have been read in but they haven’t been assigned to committee yet.  We support both of these bills (and other related bills). We testified on legislation identical to HB 240 in the past. 
Eviction provision modifications (SB 168)  This bill moves eviction proceeding hearings to one day rather than two and creates a felony for ‘unlawful occupation of property’.  It was scheduled to be heard on Feb. 4 but was cancelled.  We oppose this bill strongly and will do so when it is heard. 
Broadband sales tax exemptionSB 185  See issue description.  It has been referred to committee.  We will submit written support if this bill is heard. 

 

Platform policy goal: Community health is influenced by systems, policies, and stories that promote racial equity and economic inclusion.

Policy issue and relevant legislation What it does Status Our stance
Anti-diversity, equity and inclusion legislation – HB 742 and SB 272  HB 742 is a copycat of previous bills in that it bans any state spending on diversity, equity, and inclusion. SB 272 makes it a crime to do business while taking diversity, equity, and inclusion into consideration. HB 742 has already passed out of committee and is awaiting a small formality before it can go to the House floor. SB 272 has only been read in.  We staunchly oppose all anti-DEI legislation as it cuts directly against our purpose of strengthening and building inclusive, powerful, and healthy communities characterized by racial equity and economic justice. We testified in opposition to HB 742. 
Immigration – SB 72 and HB 540  SB 72 allows for people to become bounty hunters on people they perceive to be ‘illegal and HB 540 creates a crime to be undocumented in Missouri.  SB 72 was heard in committee and HB 540 has been referred to committee.  We oppose both of these bills as they would result in racial profiling and physical harm to people.

These bills highlighted are ones we are keeping a focus on, but here is a full list of the bills we’re tracking in Missouri.